FOSS4G Round-up
The delegates are heading home, or wandering the outback, and our big OpenGeo conference team of seven has dispersed as well. The conference was a great success this year, bringing the message of open source geospatial to well over 400 delegates (the final number might take a little while, apparently there was also a large contingent of walk-up registrations).
The OpenGeo team was busy presenting on web mapping concepts (SLD, performance, production tuning, tiling) and our core projects (OpenLayers, GeoWebCache, GeoExt, Geoserver, PostGIS). But we also took in a lot of presentations, to get a feel for the future.
The second day keynotes gave some good hints.
First, Senator Kate Lundy on Australian government open data and access policies. We are seeing this trend throughout the world — governments are recognizing the power of data access to improve services and engagement, and the democratic imperative of transparency in government. In my home province of British Columbia, the city of Nanaimo has been providing practical examples of data openness, while the City of Vancouver has made open data explicit policy, passed by council.
Second, Raul Vera from Google gave a roundup of the emerging spatial technology consensus — ubiquitous geolocation, web-based information delivery using HTML/Javascript technology, and cloud-based compute infrastructures. We like the way the open source model fits with the cloud, and we have committed to an HTML/Javascript technology for user interfaces, so this is a vision of the future we share. Vera also talked about the future non-map-based location services, and that is something we are working on for our next revisions — server-side scripting to provide direct access to all the spatial power of Geoserver and PostGIS.
Out on the exhibition floor, it was great to see Autodesk still pushing their open source agenda strongly. Jackie Ng, a local developer, presented his FDO Toolkit application at the conference, a cool desktop take to the FDO library that probably wouldn’t exist if Autodesk hadn’t open sourced that technology two years ago. Autodesk was a Gold sponsor this year along with ourselves and Ingres. I also had a chance to talk with representatives of both MapInfo and ESRI on the floor — the world of open source is definitely getting larger (Intergraph, where are you?) and more inclusive. I hope next year in Barcelona we will see representatives of European companies like Geoconcept and Cadcorp on the floor.
Dale Lutz of Safe Software highlighted the new inclusiveness of open source in his lightning talk about the “End of Religion”, in this case the religion of open source. It does seem that we are entering a new era of pragmatism (or at least acknowledging that we were always at our core pragmatic), where what matters is the best tool for the job, as measured by some combination of features and value and organizational capability.
Reports from the tutorial sessions (1.5 hour technical deep dives) indicated overwhelming demand for some topics. The “Making Maps Fast” and “Making Maps Pretty” sessions our team participated in had people on the floors and out the doors. The demand for basic information about practical operational topics remains very high — an important thing for next years organizers to think about when soliciting talks and tutorials.
My personal favourite technical talk was given by our own Tim Schaub. “Openlayers: Vector Mayhem” was a great concise tour of the vector subsystem and clarified a number of issues that I personally found a little confusing when trying to figure out the system guided only by the API documentation. When his slides go online on the conference site, be sure to check them out. For the database lovers, particularly folks who have to work with Oracle, Simon Greener’s “PostGIS and Oracle Spatial” slides will be a treasure trove of techniques for making Oracle Spatial easier to work with.
Finally, the technical highlight was the anticipated Mapserver/Geoserver performance benchmark, presented at the closing plenary. The end result showed little difference on the smaller point/polygon test layers, but some differences when the testing moved to a larger 5M line roads layers, and larger differences still for raster layers. In the end, Mapserver was faster in most cases, but usually by small amounts, the exception being raster layers, where it had a significant advantage. The database backends also provided very similar performance numbers. PostGIS was the fastest, but never by very large margins. I’m already planning for next year’s process, thinking of new ways to exercise the servers and bring their differences to the fore.
Also at the closing plenary, this year’s Sol Katz Award was presented to Daniel Morissette. Daniel pre-dates me in open source geospatial involvement; when I showed up, he was already a leader in the Mapserver community, and had contributed some very important format support options (MapInfo TAB, and Arc/INFO coverage) to the GDAL/OGR library. Over the years, he’s continued to lead Mapserver (he’s the 5.6 release manager, once again), has been a leader in two important open source companies (first DM Solutions and more recently MapGears) and has become involved in OSGeo outreach activities, in particular in his home province of Quebec. They are having regular meetings with 40 people in attendance now, which is very impressive. Many congratulations to Daniel!
So, the 2009 takeaways: yet more cross pollination between open source and proprietary; the inexorable growth of the web as primary platform; and the insatiable demand for basic information on web publishing best practices.
We look forward to participating next year, in Barcelona at FOSS4G 2010, and hope to see you there!
The delegates are heading home, or wandering the outback, and our OpenGeo conference team of seven has dispersed as well. The conference was a great success this year, bringing the message of open source geospatial to well over 400 delegates (the final number might take a little while to compute; apparently there was also a large contingent of walk-up registrations).
The OpenGeo team presented web mapping concepts (SLD, performance, production tuning, tiling) and our core projects (OpenLayers, GeoWebCache, GeoExt, Geoserver, PostGIS). We got a feel for the future from the presentations of others.
The second day keynotes gave some good hints.
First, Senator Kate Lundy spoke on Australian government open data and access policies. We are seeing this trend throughout the world—governments are recognizing the power of data access to improve services and engagement, and the democratic imperative of transparency in government. In my home province of British Columbia, the city of Nanaimo has been providing practical examples of data openness, while the City of Vancouver has made open data explicit policy, passed by council.
Second, Raul Vera from Google gave a roundup of the emerging spatial technology consensus—ubiquitous geolocation, web-based information delivery using HTML/Javascript technology, and cloud-based computing infrastructures. At OpenGeo, we like the way the open source model fits with the cloud and have committed to an HTML/Javascript technology for user interfaces, so this is a vision of the future we share. Vera also talked about the future non-map-based location services. That is something we are working on for our next revisions—server-side scripting to provide direct access to all the spatial power of Geoserver and PostGIS.
Out on the exhibition floor, it was great to see Autodesk still pushing their open source agenda strongly. Jackie Ng, a local developer, presented his FDO Toolkit application at the conference, a cool desktop take to the FDO library that probably wouldn’t exist if Autodesk hadn’t open sourced that technology two years ago. Autodesk was a Gold sponsor this year along with ourselves and Ingres. I also had a chance to talk with representatives of both MapInfo and ESRI on the floor—the world of open source is definitely getting larger (Intergraph, where are you?) and more inclusive. I hope next year in Barcelona we will see representatives of European companies like Geoconcept and Cadcorp on the floor.
Dale Lutz of Safe Software highlighted the new inclusiveness of open source in his lightning talk about the “End of Religion”, in this case the religion of open source. It does seem that we are entering a new era of pragmatism (or at least acknowledging that we were always at our core pragmatic), where what matters is the best tool for the job, as measured by some combination of features and value and organizational capability.
Reports from the tutorial sessions (1.5 hour technical deep dives) indicated overwhelming demand for some topics. The “Making Maps Fast” and “Making Maps Pretty” sessions our team participated in had people on the floors and out the doors. The demand for information about practical operational topics remains very high—an important thing for next years organizers to think about when soliciting talks and tutorials.
My personal favorite technical talk was given by our own Tim Schaub. “Openlayers: Vector Mayhem” was a concise tour of the vector subsystem and clarified a number of issues that I personally found a little confusing when trying to figure out the system guided only by the API documentation. When his slides go online on the conference site, be sure to check them out. For the database lovers, particularly folks who have to work with Oracle, Simon Greener’s “PostGIS and Oracle Spatial” slides will be a treasure trove of techniques for making Oracle Spatial easier to work with.
Finally, the technical highlight was the anticipated Mapserver/Geoserver performance benchmark, presented at the closing plenary. The end result showed little difference on the smaller point/polygon test layers, but some differences when the testing moved to a larger 5M line roads layers, and larger differences still for raster layers. In the end, Mapserver was faster in most cases, but usually by small amounts, the exception being raster layers, where it had a significant advantage. The database backends also provided very similar performance numbers. PostGIS was the fastest, but never by very large margins. I’m already planning for next year’s process, thinking of new ways to exercise the servers and bring their differences to the fore.
Also at the closing plenary, this year’s Sol Katz Award was presented to Daniel Morissette. Daniel pre-dates me in open source geospatial involvement; when I showed up, he was already a leader in the Mapserver community, and had contributed some very important format support options (MapInfo TAB, and Arc/INFO coverage) to the GDAL/OGR library. Over the years, he’s continued to lead Mapserver (he’s the 5.6 release manager, once again), has been a leader in two important open source companies (first DM Solutions and more recently MapGears), and has become involved in OSGeo outreach activities, in particular in his home province of Quebec. They are having regular meetings with 40 people in attendance now, which is very impressive. Many congratulations to Daniel!
So, the 2009 takeaways: yet more cross pollination between open source and proprietary; the inexorable growth of the web as primary platform; and the insatiable demand for information on web publishing best practices.
We look forward to participating next year, at FOSS4G 2010 in Barcelona , and hope to see you there!
